Showing posts with label film. Show all posts
Showing posts with label film. Show all posts

9.18.2007

Point? Blank!



Those who thought a certain Rob Zombie remake in August hinted that Halloween came a tad too early this year will be even more convinced after witnessing Jodie Foster’s “The Brave One.”
For it’s wearing one hell of a good mask.

For weeks before its release, Foster and director Neil Jordan have been touting that this revenge-porn thriller was going to change the way audiences look at the genre. I suppose it accomplished this in the fact that I thought Foster had nicer legs than Charles Bronson did 30-plus years ago with the penultimate ode to self justice, “Death Wish.”

But “Death Wish” made no bones about its eye-for-an-eye retribution. It was happy to wallow in its exploitative excesses, especially as the series digressed into its latter incarnations.

With its pedigree of Foster, Jordan (“Breakfast on Pluto,” “The Butcher Boy,” “The Crying Game”) and Terrence Howard, the bar of expectations is set just a wee bit higher.

But no such luck here, as every time an ethnic stereotype emerges on screen, you can rest assured that Foster’s character is going to blow their face off with her pistol.

If there was an essay on the effects of violence, it must have been muffled by the thunderous blast of her pistol, or the even louder cheers from audience member as victims lay in pools of their own blood.

Look, I have no problem with vengeance genus of film. And I realize that the careers of Arnold Schwarzenegger, Sylvester Stallone and Steven Seagal were at times wholly dependant on having a girlfriend, wife, mother, sister, brother, partner, cousin, friend, accountant, pool boy, etc. abducted and/or killed.

But witnessing a savvy actress such as Foster spouting cheesy 80s-era one liners such as “Who’s the bitch, now?” as she pulls the trigger is rather deflating.

Foster plays Erica Bane, a public radio personality who, with her fiancee, is brutally attacked in Central Park one fateful evening. She survives. He does not. The film flirts with the notion of her dealing with the loss and the disorienting feeling of being a stranger not only in her home city, but her own skin.

We see her first wary steps of trying to crawl out of her cocoon and re-enter the life she knew. But once she’s out and about, it’s mere minutes before she’s making seedy back-alley deals for purchasing firearms and dispensing her own brand of anger-fueled justice.

Sorry, but the notion of a pistol-packing Nina Totenberg is just not one that rests easy on the brain.

As (un)luck would have it, one of Erica’s first forays back into the fray involved an ill-timed Sprite run at the local convenience store where a domestic squabble gets settled with bullets. Her first instinct is to draw her trusty sidearm, dispose of the bad guy and quickly leave the premises (with the security tape securely tucked into her knapsack).

Afterward, there is another encounter on a subway involving some bullies who steal an iPod from a commuter. But Jordan wants to make sure that you think these guys deserve what’s about to come to them by having them pick on a little boy and his dad and pull a knife on Erica. As fate would have it, Erica was fortunate enough to pick the only subway train that was vacant and that stopped at the only terminal where there was not a witness to be found.

On and on it devolves, trying to pepper itself with small symbolic gestures of how she is apparently affected by her actions (shower with her clothes on to wash away the sins? You betcha!). But that all rings false louder than the slugs from her 9 millimeter.

At least in exploitation films like “Ms. 45,” “Fight for Your Life” and “Thriller: A Cruel Picture” (aka “They Call Her One Eye”), they had the courage of their convictions and offered us no such nonsense of guilt and remorse.

Even Howard’s straight-arrow police detective who is on the heels of her spree makes a last-minute turn that is unexpected as it is preposterous.

Foster is above every scene she’s in. She attacks her role with the same ferocity she’s approached every role she’s chosen (even lighter fluff like “Flightplan” and “Nell”). But she’s reduced to an N.R.A. pinup – a Charlton Heston masturbatory fantasy.

The crowd I witnessed “The Brave One” with was obviously impressed by the sadistic stream flowing through it, and I suppose since summer has ended at the box office, there is a void left behind for mindless mayhem that this may fill.

But for those entering the film hoping for more out of the esteemed actress and director than a pile of bodies,”The Brave One’s” a dead end.

9.11.2007

All aboard


Is it just me, or does everything sound just a bit more “Western-ish” with the suffix “-rado?”
“Desperado,” “Silverado,””El Dorado” It's like adding “-capades” after something and automatically thinking of ice skating.

Adding “-rado” somewhere in “3:10 to Yuma” may have helped the title, which does not exactly roll off the tongue, but the film certainly needs no help elsewhere, as director James Mangold's solid, scruffy take on the wild west is a throwback in the best possible ways.

Based on an Elmore Leonard's tale (and it's 1957 film), “Yuma” is steeped in all the spur-janglin', gun-totin', spittoon-dingin' elements that made this type of film into a genre all its own.

“Yuma” pits rancher Dan Evans (played by Christian Bale) against outlaw Ben Wade (played by Russel Crowe). Evans is struggling to save his property from encroaching railroad magnates and to save his dignity for his wife and two young sons.

Hobbled by battle in the Civil War and shepherding cattle on a dry dirt patch, Evans is both broke and broken.

When Wade's posse gallops into town for a local stagecoach heist, Wade is nabbed by the local law. The desperate and destitute Evans volunteers to escort the wily outlaw to a nearby town to be shipped out and face trial.

Evans sees the journey as a chance to make enough to save his farm and what little pride he has left because he's “tired of the way his boys look at him and tired of the way his wife won't.”
Wade gamely eggs Evans on, for he first sees him as just another body for target practice when his cronies come to rescue him.

But it's soon obvious that Wade takes a shine to this tattered-but-determined rancher. He sees in him the same resolve and steely drive that he possesses, and perhaps sees the man he could have been if he were on the right side of the law.

This is not to say that Wade is a softy by any means. He's quick to show men the losing side of his pistol and doesn't much care for excuses.

Director Mangold could not have found a better man to fill Wade's Tony Lamas (it's a popular cowboy boot brand, look it up). Crowe seems genetically engineered for such films – from his charcoal-burnt vocals to his swaggering tree-trunk physique. And his playful, deadly glint makes him equally hard to resist and harder to read.

And as Bale have proven in past roles (most notably his ghostly turn in “The Machinist”), he is capable of holding what seems like decades of pain in his hollow cheeks. His Evans is a pitiful man, but not once do you pity him, as he balances on the edge of a breaking point.

The casting of the two actors is essential to “Yuma,” as it is more about their psychological showdown than their ability to unholster their firearms. There are moments of Winchester-pumped action that puncture the film, but Mangold seems more interested in watching the two men watch one another – each taunting, circling and even admiring the other.

The supporting cast is as strong as its unbridled landscape, too. Gretchen Mol makes a welcome return, albeit a brief one, as Evans' long-suffering wife, and Peter Fonda, worn and leathery as a floor-length duster, does his best John Wayne impersonation as an old antagonist of Wade's.


But it is Ben Foster who reigns in the film's biggest surprise in a crucial role as Wade's vicious right-had gun Charlie Prince. In past roles, Foster has either underplayed his part (the Angel is “X-Men 3”) or acted like he forgot his daily dose of Ridalin (“Alpha Dog”). But his barnstorming performance here demonstrates he's destined for bigger things. As Charlie, he watches over his captured boss like a coyote watches over a flock of wayward sheep, and we sit one edge waiting for him to move in for the kill.

The death knell for the western genre has been sounding for years, but every so often a film rolls into theaters like a stray tumbleweed to remind us that as it may be long past the high noon of its popularity, the heart of the traditional style still beats loudly (2003's dream-like “Open Range” and 2005's gritty “The Proposition” are recent examples that come to mind).

“3:10 to Yuma” may not be remembered as a classic of the genre (the conclusion drags on a little too long and is filled with the cliches of gangs of gunmen who, when it comes down to it, can't seem to hit their target if it slapped them in the face), but it certainly is enough to jumpstart the interest of those who have grown up thinking that westerns are typified by self-important pomp like “Dances with Wolves” caricature-laden oaters like “Tombstone” or parodic romps like “Shanghai Noon,” and get them to search the shelves of the video store for when the West was (number) one.

8.29.2007

Up and Autumn

To quote the film “Jarhead,” “Welcome to the suck.”
This time of year is that little window between summer and fall in which studios purge their shelves. So, instead of sifting through the cinematic discount bins this week, I will try to get you amped for the coming season of more prestigious pictures.
Mind you, not all of the releases are jockeying for trophies during the seemingly endless award season, but they do carry with them the promise of cinematic escape beyond the latest crop of films that is springing up like ragweed at the multiplex.

Sept. 7

The Brothers Solomon
Starring: Will Arnett, Will Forte, Lee Majors
Two socially stunted men try to impregnate a woman to fulfill a dying father’s request.
Prognosis: The big screen has yet to provide TV funnyman Arnett (“Arrested Development”) with something suitable to his talents (“Let’s Go to Prison,” anyone?). This Farrelly Brothers-style clone does not appear to be that picture, either.
Shoot ‘Em Up
Starring: Clive Owen, Paul GiamattiA mysterious gunman appears out of nowhere to rescue a woman and child from a hired hit.
Prognosis: Heavily styled Matrix-y gunplay is buoyed by its strong leads.
3:10 to Yuma
Starring: Christian Bale, Russell Crowe
A down-on-his-luck rancher volunteers to escort a criminal across rugged terrain to make the titular train.
Prognosis: While critics have been eulogizing the Western genre for years, Bale (as the rancher) and Crowe (as the criminal) just might prove otherwise.



Sept. 14
Mr. Woodcock
Starring: Billy Bob Thorton, Sean Williams Scott, Susan Sarandon
A bullying gym coach re-enters the life of his former tormentee as he tries to woo the young man’s mommy.
Prognosis: If you have a sense of déjà vu, it’s because this one has been threatening to be released for a couple of years now. Never a good sign.

Sept. 21



Across the Universe
Starring: Jim Sturgess, Evan Rachel Wood
The always-engaging director Julie Taymor envisions a pair of lovers in the ‘60s in a film set entirely to Beatles’ songs.
Prognosis: If it fails, you can bet it will be one beautiful disaster.

Resident Evil: Apocalypse
Starring: Milla Jovovich, Oded Fehr, Mike Epps.
In the third film based on the video game, our hero Alice is planted in the Nevada desert when trying to annihilate ferocious zombie scum.
Prognosis: The first two films were as fun as watching someone play Pac-Man for 90 minutes, but the trailers for “Apocalypse” look compelling enough to at least consider the adage “The third time’s the charm.”

Good Luck Chuck

Starring: Dane Cook, Jessica Alba
Not a sequel to the summer’s loathsome Adam Sandler “comedy,” this film stars yet another inexplicably popular comedian as Chuck, a man whose reputation as a good luck charm has women lining up to lie down with him.
Prognosis: Perhaps the neediest comic working today, Cook reeks of desperation in every role he takes.

The Assassination of Jesse James by That Coward Robert Ford
Starring: Brad Pitt, Sam Rockwell, Casey Affleck, Zooey Deschanel, Mary-Louise Parker
As fabled gunslinger Jesse James plans his next train robbery, his life may be threatened by someone close to his camp – can you guess his name?
Prognosis: Another shelf squatter, “Jesse” was supposed to be released last year, but the star power and director Andrew Dominik (who last made the intense “Chopper” with Eric Bana) cannot be denied (or maybe it can, if you consider last year’s overstuffed turkey “All the King’s Men”).

Sept. 28
Run, Fat Boy, Run
Starring: Simon Pegg, Hank Azaria, Thandie Newton
After leaving his pregnant girlfriend at the altar, a chubby schmuck vows to complete a marathon to prove he’s a changed man.
Prognosis: It’s a sitcom-worthy plot that just may work, considering it is being directed by “Friends’” David Schwimmer.

Lust, Caution
Starring: Tony Leung, Joan Chen
Director Ang Lee comes down from “Brokeback Mountain” to tell this more intimate World War II-era tale of a powerful politician and a woman who just can’t seem to quit him.
Prognosis: Not the hot-button topic of his previous, and shot in the Mandarin tongue, “Lust” will have much smaller fanfare, but may contain the same intensity for which the director is best known.

Oct. 5
The Heartbreak Kid
Starring: Ben Stiller, Michelle Monoghan
A man meets the woman of his dreams – to bad it’s while he is on his honeymoon with his loopy new wife.
Prognosis: Stiller reunites with his cinematic catapult – The Farrelly Brothers – in this remake of the Neil Simon flick.

Oct. 12
30 Days of Night
Starring: Josh Hartnett, Ben Foster, Melissa George
Alaska is known for its long stretches sans daylight, so what better place for vampires to chill their fangs?
Prognosis: Based on the popular comic (sorry, fanboys, you can call it a “graphic novel” just as you refer to your dolls as “action figures”), this film looks to keep the same creepy aesthetic that made it such a smash.

Hitman
Starring: Timothy Olyphant, Dougray Scott
A bar-coded assassin kicks some assassin ass in this big screen treatment of the violently popular (or is that popularly violent?) video game.
Prognosis: Olyphant attempts to parlay his summer hit as the heavy in the latest “Die Hard” flick into leading man turf. But it may suffer from the similar (and more stylish) “Shoot ‘Em Up” a month prior.

Oct. 19
Rendition

Starring: Reese Witehrsppon, Jake Gyllenhaal, Meryl Streep, Alan Arkin and Peter Saarsgard
Reese Witherspoon stars as the wife of an Egypt-born chemical engineer who's kidnapped by the Feds and stashed in a secret detention facility, where a compassionate CIA analyst (Jake Gyllenhaal) has doubts about the tactics of interrogation.
Prognosis: Hmmm, how do you think we can get our point across that torture is bad? I know, let's get our most wholesome-looking actress and former Oscar winner, Reese Witherspoon, and set her up for ol' fashioned Cheney-style waterboarding. While the film's stance is clear, let's hope they don't – pardon the expression – hit us over the head with it.


Oct. 26
Martian Child
Starring: John Cusak, Joan CusakJohn Cusack stars once again as a writer (after this summer's hit “1408”) who adopts an outcast child who claims he is from another planet.
Prognosis: Bumped from its original release this summer, the trailer for this one seems a tad gooey, but a flick full of Cusak's can turn that around into something much more.

Things We Lost in the Fire
Starring: Halle Berry, Benicio Del ToroTwo troubled childhood friends attempt to help one another out in order to save each other and themselves.
Prognosis: with the help of a gifted director (Susanne Bier, “After the Wedding”) and a talented co-star, Berry looks to turn her post-Oscar slump around to prove that she really did earn that statuette, despite “Catwoman”... and “Gothika” and “X-Men 3”... and “Perfect Stranger” and... you get the picture.

Saw IV
Starring: Tobin Bell
The Rube Goldberg of death, Jigsaw and his accomplice took a dirt nap in the last entry of the franchise, but when more victims start turning up under mysteriously similar circumstances, the FBI uncovers the truth to his origins.
Prognosis: Despite having the dubious distinction of helping to create the whole “torture porn” genre, “Saw” has managed to keep audiences coming back for more. And as long as the cash keeps rolling in, it seems that Jigsaw is more than willing to figure out creative ways to kill unsuspecting people.

Nov. 2
Bee Movie
Starring: (the voices of) Jerry Seinfeld, Chris Rock,
A stinging insect looks to escape the drone of the honeycomb and seek more out of life.
Prognosis: Though the animation looks pretty pathetic and the trailer's jokes have as much sting as a moth, if anyone can create something out of nothing, it's Seinfeld.

American Gangster
Starring: Denzel Washington, Russell Crowe
“Gangster” follows the true tale of a Harlem drug lord who became one of the most powerful crime figures in the country and a cop hell-bent on bringing him to justice.
Prognosis: Here’s wishing Washington is in full “Training Day” mode and Crowe and director Ridley Scott give us more “Gladiator” than “A Good Year.”

Nov. 9
No Country for Old Men
Starring: Tommy Lee Jones, Javier Bardem, Josh Brolin, Woody Harrelson
A hunter in the wilderness happens upon a stash of cash, drugs and a couple of dead bodies.
Prognosis: The Coen Brothers look poised to return to their “Blood Simple” roots in “Men,” which was nominated for top honors at this year’s Cannes Film Festival.

Nov. 16
Beowulf
Starring: (the voices of) Angelina Jolie, Anthony Hopkins, Robin Wrigth Penn, Ray Winstone.
See people, this is what we need to get our high school students to read the classics – more Angelina Jolie nudity! Actually, only a CGI version of the bombshell makes an in-the-buff appearance, but that’s better than nothing.
Prognosis: Like saying you admire “Playboy” for the articles, you can pretend to be awed by the special effects of this motion-capture movie.

Margot at the Wedding
Starring: Nicole Kidman, Jack Black, Jennifer Jason Leigh
Margot is a caustic gal who arrives on the eve of her sister’s wedding and attempts to sever the impeding ties to her Boho beau.
Prognosis: A cantankerous Kidman is an interesting choice for director Noah Baumbach (“The Squid and the Whale”), and Black looks as though he’s toned down his mania to let others actually share the screen with him.

Nov. 21
Enchanted
Starring: Amy Adams, Patrick Dempsey
A cartoon princess forced to leave her world for modern-day New York, falls in love with her Prince McDreamy.
Prognosis: Cute premise, but man does it look like one big commercial for Disney.

Nov. 30
Cassandra's Dream
Starring: Colin Farrell, Ewan McGregor, Haley Atwell
Woody Allen directs a tale of two brothers and a dangerous woman who enters their lives and threatens to sever their bond.
Prognosis: Sounds like a more meditative Woody (which usually provides more interesting results).

Dec. 7
The Golden Compass
Starring: Nicole Kidman, Daniel Craig, Dakota Blue Richards
Based on the “His Dark Materials” series of books, “Compass” follows 12-year-old Lyra as she sets out for adventure across the globe in an effort to save it.
Prognosis: It’s cast is top notch with Kidman and Craig, until you consider the last time they teamed up was this summer’s biggest flop “The Invasion.” Plus, can the movie world handle more than one precocious pre-teen named Dakota?

Dec. 14
I am Legend
Starring: Will Smith, a dog
A brilliant scientist somehow escapes a plague that he believes wipes out the entire human race – or does it?
Prognosis: This screenplay has been tossed around more than a soccer ball, the director has little impressive history (videos for Britney, Janet Jackson and the overheated Keanu Reeves flick “Constantine”), and star Smith may be out of his element from saving the world during the summer months (“Independence Day,” “Men in Black,” “I Robot”). But it may provide the perfect antidote for some of the season’s stuffier releases.

Alvin and the Chipmunks
Starring: Jason Lee, David Cross, animated rodentia
A combination of CGI and live action is mixed for this update on the novelty cartoon.
Prognosis: One word – “Garfield.” This is not going to end well.

Dec. 21
National Treasure: Book of Secrets
Starring: Nicolas Cage, Helen Mirren, John Voight, Ed Harris
Cage returns as modern-day Indiana Jones Ben Gates as he searches for stolen pages from John Wilkes Booth diary.
Prognosis: Taking a page from “Indiana Jones and the Last Crusade,” “Treasure” casts Mirren as Cage's mommy who joins the hunt.

Sweeney Todd
Starring: Johnny Depp, Helen Bonham Carter, Alan Rickman, Sacha Baron Cohen
Depp once again teams with director Tim Burton in this musical tale of a demented barber.
Prognosis: Jack Sparrow, Borat and two Harry Potter heavies? Directed by the guy from “Edward Scissorhands?” Are your tickets purchased now, or are you waiting another five minutes?

Walk Hard: The Dewey Cox Story
Starring: John C. Reilly, Jenna Fischer, Kristen Wiig, Tim Meadows
Spoofing on musical bio-pics (are you listening, “Walk the Line?”), the film follows this drugged-up musical sex machine through his various incarnations in a the musical landscape.
Prognosis: Could this be the trifecta for Judd Apatow, who scored with this summer's “Knocked Up” and “Superbad?” This can't-miss cast of clowns is almost a guarantee to run rings of fire around the competition.


Dec. 25
Aliens vs. Predator: Requiem
Starring: John Ortiz, Steven Pasquale, Johnny Lewis
Two warring intergalactic tribes of monsters pick a small town to lay the smackdown on one another.Prognosis: Sure, the first one was excruciating, but the directorial responsibilities have been handed over from a hack to a pair who have been responsible for some of the coolest special effects in recent cinema.

Charlie Wilson’s War
Starring: Tom Hanks, Julia Roberts, Philip Seymour Hoffman
Texas Republican congressman Charlie Wilson is a bad man. His shady dealings with Afghan rebels took a heavy toll on human lives.
Prognosis: Director Mike Nichols gave Roberts her best part in ages is 2005's “Closer,” and may perhaps do the same for Hanks, who could use a boost after flops such as “The Ladykillers,” “The Terminal” and “DaVinci Code.”

The Bucket List
Starring: Jack Nicholson, Morgan Freeman, Sean Hayes
Two terminally-ill cancer patients set out to check off a to-do list before they die.
Prognosis: How come nobody thought to cast Freeman with Nicholson before this? Unfortunately director Rob Reiner (“Rumor Has It...,” “Alex and Emma,” “The Story of Us” ) may ultimately decide their fate.

Dec. 26
There Will Be Blood
Starring: Daniel Day-Lewis, Paul Dano
Family, greed, religion and oil are all stirred together in this tale following a Texas prospector and the turn of the century.
Prognosis: In perhaps the best trailer since last year's “Little Children,” P.T. Anderson's complex tale looks as though it may strike more than black gold come Oscar time.

8.21.2007

'Super-OK'



It’s a little-known literary fact that Robert Burns’ poem, ‘Ode to a Mouse’ originally read:
“The best plans of men to get laid do often go awry.”

Burns’ stuffy publisher told him to ‘tone it down’ to make the now-famous little ditty more marketable.

But whatever the translation, either would apply to the plot of “Superbad,” the new comedy from the Judd Apatow camp, which looks to tighten its grip on Hollywood comedies, between this film, the summer’s earlier hit “Knocked Up,” and 2005’s “40-Year-Old Virgin.”

While Apatow did not direct this one as he did the previous two (he passed the responsibility to longtime collaborator Greg Mattola), his fingerprints are all over it.

The film once again follows misfit man-boys on a quest to make sense of the opposite sex. This time, the quest takes place over the course of one high school evening and the leads are two horny teens, Seth (played by the beefy Jonah Hill) and Evan (played by the gangly Michael Cera).

Many have praised this film for carefully balancing its smut with its heart. And, frankly, I don’t buy into the latter, at least in terms of compassion for the females. The treacle tossed in at the film’s finale of both boys respecting the objects of their desires – after everyone thoroughly objectifies women throughout the film’s running time – just doesn’t wash.”I Now Pronounce You Chuck and Larry” got raked over the coals this summer for similar treatment toward gays, but somehow “Superbad” has been given a pass.

This is not to say that the film is not funny. For it is – both feverishly and frequently. But why even try to give a boys hearts when there’s nothing to hang their heart on?

(Speaking of “heart on,” be prepared for one of the most obsessive predilection of male genitalia this side of a porno.)

After all this ribaldry, why do the producers feel that our heroes must Learn Something or Grow and allow them to Get the Girl? Did John Belushi’s Bluto take away a life lesson after his years in Delta House? Did Jeff Spicoli learn to “just say no” by the end of his “Fast Times?”
No dammit. They were hedonistic jackasses. And they felt more real because of it.

Apatow has a very sharp ear for male-male friendships throughout awkward times in their lives (in “Virgin” it’s middle age, in “Knocked Up,” it’s pregnancy and here it’s high school). But what he has yet to find is what draws women to these clueless dolts. Really, only Carell's virgin was deserving of a female companion.

If you thought Seth Rogan (who wrote the screenplay and co-stars as a crazy cop) was an unlikely bed partner for the sexy Katherine Heigl in “Knocked Up,” you’ll have a helluva time trying to figure out what Emma Stone’s hot, hip Jules sees in Hill’s slovenly profane Seth.
In the words of the immortal Dean Wormer (rest in peace), “Fat, drunk and stupid is no way to go through life.”

There are two true finds in “Superbad,” and one has already been found by a select few who adored the brilliant, short-lived TV show “Arrested Development” (rest in peace). Michael Cera, who some remember as the stammering straight-arrow George Michael (he who harbored the unholy crush on his cousin), plays basically the same character with awkward Evan. Except here, you get to hear him swear up a storm. Cera’s stock is sure to rise in the months following this film, as his unique dry approach is a throwback to early Bob Newhart, and is sorely lacking in comedy today.

The other standout is Christopher Mintz-Plasse as Fogell. In the pantheon of teen sex comedies, many a one-named co-star has earned immortal status – Booger, Bluto, Meat, Stifler, Spicoli. Be prepared to add another to its hallowed halls – McLovin. For that is the name Fogell arbitrarily decides to rechristen himself upon receiving a fake ID that lists him as a 25-year-old Hawaiian organ donor.

Plucked from obscurity, you can see role of geeky outsider Mintz-Plasse fits very snugly on the actor, making his performance all the more authentic. You wish the same care had been given to the ladies that populate the film, or that they were ditched altogether.

McLovin spends the majority of the time riding in the back of a cop car commandeered by two wildly inappropriate arms of the law (Rogan and “SNL’s” Bill Hader). And as outlandish as the cops’ behavior may seem, the film called to mind similar high school shenanigans a buddy and I had with a sad, lonely night security guard at a port in Virginia Beach. He had no problems volunteering to get videotaped joyfully putting a billy-clubbing, handcuffing smackdown on yours truly.

So I invite the makers to bring on the zaniness – the carefree, empty-headed escapades that accompany adolescence and show us that you care as much for the women as you do for the lads and the, um, equipment. Otherwise, don’t feel obligated to employ tacked-on morals as a result of their ribaldry.

For it only waters down the drinks at what could be one heck of a fun party.

8.05.2007

Bourne, again



The franchise that brought you a criminal being mauled by a magazine, returns to present death by dish towel.


Yup, “The Bourne Ultimatum,” the third film in the Bourne series brings back our hero, Jason Bourne (played by Matt Damon) who takes out one of his adversaries using toiletries as a deadly weapon.


It may sound comical, but director Paul Greengrass (returning after “United 97” for his “Bourne” duties) is in no laughing mood.


Bourne, the awesome superspy, is edging ever so close to his true identity, and with a seeming worldwide cadre of cops and spooks on his tail, it is quite the task.


August is usually the month of “remora releases.” By that, I mean that studios usually plop their least-trusted summer flicks in the pond and hope that they latch on to the wallets of indiscriminate moviegoers eager to get a few more hours in the air-conditioned theater before summer's end.


But Universal should have had more faith in the franchise, as it easily muscles its way among the shape-shifting robots and hard-dying action predecessors.


In fact, the action is vacuum-sealed so tightly within its two-hour run time, there's scant time for our hero – or the audience – to come up for air. But this is not at the sacrifice of character development, as the brooding hero and his friends/nemeses at the C.I.A. Get adequate depth provided as play tag across the globe.


Those returning to lace up their running shoes for this third-time worldwide sprint include Damon, Julia Stiles and Joan Allen, while allowing David Strathairn and Albert Finney into the race. All of them want Bourne, but their motives are across the board.


The film begins as an addendum to “Supremecy,” as a tattered Bourne shuffles through the snowy Moscow streets, eluding police and in badly need of some iodine after the nasty car crash that ended the previous film.


He then hops to jolly old England, where a reporter is in the process of peeling the onion known as Blackbriar, a double super-secret U.S. espionage program that even C.I.A. members are kept in the dark about. The program was apparently the birth of such superhuman spies as Bourne, turning them all into arm-cracking, magazine-wielding, towel-twisting terrors.


The film changes little of the driver's-seat aspect that made “Supremacy” such a rush. It once again places viewers nose-to-nose with its players and uses shots that look as though they were recorded from a car speeding over a pot-hole-laden street, spliced with angles from a surveillance camera perspective.


The agita-inducing lenswork, though, works for the film's personal progression, allowing intimacy with its leads that create character depth without the need for wordy exposition.
Critics have noted that the Bourne-like facelift given to the James Bond franchise, and while this may prove true, the “Bourne” series has an even more urgent appeal, considering the main thrust is our hero's search for self.


Damon should be credited for transitioning his pretty-boy features into a haunted shell of a man. As he collects parcels of his past like seashells, his intensity is not merely viewed by his wake of bodies, but with the glow of ghosts he may not yet want to confront.


The rest of “Bourne's” cast is populated with A-grade actors, each capable of using facial expressions, body language and awkward pauses to supplement their lack of dialogue(well, not so much Stiles, who only musters a vacant stare, incapable of throwing purpose behind it).
“Bourne” wraps itself up tightly in the cloak of this cloak-and-dagger thriller, calling into question the motives of each of its characters until the final frames. And “Ultimatum” is a fitting conclusion for its protagonist, who was once lost in the sea of his own consciousness.


The “Bourne” legacy continues with another installment from writer Robert Ludlam, titled, ironically, “The Bourne Legacy.” Here's hoping that Greengrass and Damon have yet another cinematic itch to scratch, for their teamwork has provided filmgoers with many a manic, magic moment.


And, besides, there is still an arsenal of household items Bourne can use to take down an army of enemies.

7.29.2007

Hi, I'm Rob Rector. You may remember me from such reviews as "Shrek Dreck" and "Pirates of the Caribbean:At Wit's End"



For more than half my life, “The Simpsons” have been there for me. They have given me with tutelage beyond any college professor ever could, provided me role models, taught me work and parenting skills, and have given me an endless conversational zingers that I would pass off as my own wit to unknowing listeners.

Institutionally, they have surpassed being a trend and have become embedded in our pop culture – not only reflecting it, but at a time, dictating it.

A Google search alone will yeild 60 million page references to America's favorite yellow, four-fingered family (Youtube 93, 500, for those keeping track).

The omnipotent clan can be viewed almost round-the-clock on television (an observation deftly decried by patriarch Homer in the film's intro). Books have delved into the show's philosophy, religious themes, life lessons and copious analyses on each and every episode.

The lines from the show have reached immortality (Homer's disgruntled grunt “D'oh has made it into both the Oxford English Dictionary and Webster's Millennium Dictionary).

So seriously, what's left that has not been accomplished by the family but the big screen.
The creators had been oh-so-coy about the release of a film, and announced it by surprise last summer. Credit has to be given to them for not selling out and releasing the film at the height of the show's zeitgeist in the early 90s, as they could have easily cashed in on their name, much like character Krusty the Clown does with much of the life-threatening kids toys he haphazardly slaps his name upon for a quick paycheck.

The finest compliment I can bestow upon the film is that it feels just like a 90-minute episode written during their sixth or seventh season (which many feel were its best). With an almost two-decade buildup, there is hardly an expectation that the film would be capable of exceeding short of having Marge letting her Frank Lloyd Wright-designed hair down and do a lap dance for you in your movie seat (sorry, perhaps I have been too obsessive a fan over the years).

I will not bother going over the characters in the review, for if you are not at the least bit familiar with them as of yet, the only thing I can say to you is: “Welcome to Earth. Sorry for the current state of affairs in the White House. Hope you enjoy your stay before heading back to your planet.”

The film's story unfolds in classic Simpsonian fashion – which is to say, from the most tangential places. Let's just say the family has added a pig to the clan and when it is time for Homer to rid of the porcine feculence, he dumps it into Springfield Lake, which many show watchers may remember is also home to that mutated Darwinian oddity Blinky, the three-eyed fish – a result of the mass waste dumping that takes place within.

This causes the EPA's Nazi-like head Cargill (voiced by the ever-dependable Albert Brooks) to place a glass dome over the entire town, cordoning it off from the country like some giant terrarium. Meanwhile, Homer's careless actions once again places him at odds with his entire family – wife Marge, children Bart, Lisa and baby Maggie. The beauty of the film, as with the television show, is that regardless of just how outrageous the predicament encountered by the sleepy little Hamlet of Springfield faces, the core of family is the overriding theme.

Instead of ruining the gags (of which there are more than enough to fill a dozen summer “comedies”), I'll try to focus on just why audiences will get much d'oh! for their dough.
Some of the sweeping shots of the town are rendered using 3-D animation, and for once, you really get the feel of the scope of the suburb. It's used sparingly, but it's just enough to give the moments of chaos an epic sweep to them.

Hans Zimmer takes over for Danny Elfman as Oscar-winning musical director, and the composer of such films as “Pirates of the Caribbean,” “Batman Begins,” “Gladiator,” and “The Lion King” pays perfect homage to the latter's score and adds the elegaic scope necessary for the series' first cinematic endeavor.

The cast of Dan Castelleneta, Julie Kavner, Yeardly Smith, Nancy Cartwright, Harry Shearer and Hank Azaria are uniformly excellent, but one almost yearns for hearing more from their much-loved supporting characters (Principal Skinner, Duffman, we hardly knew ye!). It's a minor gripe, but an almost impossible task to ask, since there is no way 18-years of wacky bit players can be siphoned into 90 minutes.

Where the film really reaches the same stratospheric heights (as when Homer became an astronaut) is in the writing. The film has reeled in past series' scribe vets as George Meyer, David Mirkin, Mike Scully, Mike Reiss and Jon Vitti, whose names may not mean much to the average readers, but who have collectively won more Emmys for their work than Homer's been struck in his big bald noggin.

For the first 20 minutes of the film, the jokes are released in such a rapid-fire succession that it's hard to keep up. Once the film settles into its groove, it has the feel of a film narrative, not three half-hour episodes stitched together.

The resulting film is pure, unfiltered “Simpsons” that will provide even the most cynical “Simpsons” critics more than enough to chortle about. Politics, religion, relationships and community – the show's touchstones – are all sufficiently skewered. And, like all cartoons with longevity, it has the feeling of both timeliness and timelessness. With guest stars throughout the years of everyone from weird Al Yankovic to reclusive author Thomas Pynchon (twice!), we should expect nothing less.

While they get ready to launch their 19th season on television, the creators of “The Simpsons” can rest assured that they now have yet another media to maintain immortality, and this particular fan would not have it any other way.

7.24.2007

Quite the hold

Film versions of Broadway musicals are a little like recordings of concerts. They've been cleaned up a bit, tweaked here and there and generally polished to a blinding sheen.
But this also takes away from the grit and grime of live performances that adds to the overall thrill.
Just look at the graveyard of movie musicals based on plays throughout the past few years -- “Rent,” “Phantom of the Opera” and “The Producers” are but a few (personally, I'd toss “Dreamgirls” in there, too).
Lucky for “Hairspray” though, it's roots are showing. For it began as a film, and sculpted by the grandaddy of garish garbage and glee, John Waters. After having plumbed the depths of depravity with films such as “Pink Flamingos,” “Female Trouble” and “Desperate Living,” the director's 1988 original was perhaps his most mainstream film, but it still had the tart wit and social commentary for which Waters was well-known.
That Waters vibe can be felt throughout this latest incarnation of “Hairspray” (the director even turns up for a hysterical cameo in the film's infectious opening number “Good Morning, Baltimore.”
But those who never quite enjoyed a drink from Water's cinematic well (some may say septic tank), the auteur's presence should not be a deterrent from viewing perhaps the most bubbly fun to be had at the movies so far this summer.
Following the early '60s life of young zaftig Tracy Turnblad (played by newcomer Nikki Blonsky), a marshmallow of a teen whose sole reason for living is to dance. Her main outlet to shake her generous assets is “The Corny Collins Show,” a televised Baltimore dance program where the local kids go to get their groove on.
One day a week is deigned “Negro Day,” in which local black kids can break out and boogie, so long as the floor is cleared of all white kids. The day further starches the shirts of the local programmers, including manager Velma Von Tussle (played by a much-welcomed-back Michelle Pfeiffer) who does not want her daughter's chances to be crowned the show's Miss Baltimore Crabs sullied by some dark-skinned hooligans. For the kids, of course, this day is the soul of the show, where the latest, most mod moves are on proud display.
The chubby Tracy is an outcast herself in the squeaky clean, model-thin world of TV. She soon befriends Seaweed (played by electric newcomer Elijah Kelley), one of the featured dancers on Negro Day, and the son of the day's host Motormouth Maybelle (played by magnetic-but-underused Queen Latifah).
After learning a few bold moves from her new friends, Tracy earns a spot on the show and her care-free hip-swiveling is soon earning her fans from all over the city, hon.
With the help of her best friend Penny (played by Amanda Bynes) and her parents, Tracy is determined to integrate the show, regardless of the consequences.
The flick's philosophy is one of being comfortable with who you are – regardless of size, age, race, etc. -- and there is room for everyone out there on life's dance floor. But the film never once feels preachy or synthetic, and composers Marc Shaiman and Scott Williams have ensured that you will be too busy getting caught up in the music to let things get too heavy-handed.
There is just one element of the film you may have noticed that I have yet to bring up, and that is because I really do not know what to make of it. John Travolta as Edna Turnblad – packed behind pounds of latex – a muumuu-clad mama made famous by the late Divine. His beady little eyes look like two raisins in a sea of pancake batter plastering his face. His efforts to acquire a Bal'more accent are quite distracting as well.
There are a few moments in which he once again captures that “Grease” -era exuberance, not necessarily in a dance number, but in his more tender moments as Tracy's shut-in mother. It is certainly his best performance in years, yet it was still difficult to lose sight of the fact that it was John Travolta in a fat suit (in contrast, Eddie Murphy became several diverse family members hidden behind his makeup in “The Nutty Professor”). The one time that Travolta ceases to be an actor in drag is perhaps the film's best number, a touching duet with husband Wilbur (played with feather-light feet by Christopher Walken), as they celebrate growing older with one that you love.
Overall, though, the film is completely engaging, bubbling over with heart and song, and this “Hairspary” will hold up long after leaving the theater.

7.17.2007

'Phoenix' rises



By the time this is printed, Potter-passion will have reached fever pitch, with many skimming the pages of the latest book, “Harry Potter and the Deathly Hollows” to see which of their beloved heroes survives.

While Harry, Ron and Hermoine may cast their last spell on page, fans (and nan-fans) can still drink in the magic potion on the big screen for a few more years, starting with the just-released “Order of the Phoenix,” the fifth of the seven-part series.

Each film has gained momentum in terms of storytelling, style and clarity. What makes “Phoenix” rise is what it leaves out.

Sheared of several subplots that the 807-page tome contained (adios, Ron and Hermione storylines; sayonara house elves), screenwriter Michael Goldberg keeps the hocus pocus focus solely on our titular wizard and the impending dread of a confrontation with Lord Voldemort (played by Ralph Finnes).

The result is the leanest “Potter” yet. At a taut 138 minute, “Phoenix” cuts to the quick and cuts out the Quiddich, leaving a foreboding emotional core that stands as one of the series' best.

Potter (played by the ever-studlier Daniel Radcliffe) is once again taking residence with his wretched adopted family, after surviving a near-fatal attack against Voldemort, that noseless nuisance of the Dark Arts and the one responsible for the deaths of Harry's parents.

When Harry is forced to vanquish two rogue underworld spirits by casting spells, it placed him in front of the Ministry of Magic's counsel, who seek to expel the young sorcerer from Hogwarts School of Witchcraft and Wizardry for practicing magic in the human world before he turned 18 (apparently magic and alcohol have a lot in common).

Rushing to his defense is Headmaster Dumbledore (Michael Gambon), who gets Harry reinstated, but whose actions rouse suspicion with the ministry that he is seeking higher office and that he actually believes that Voldemort could resurface from the depths of hell.

The deck of tarot cards seems stacked against Harry and Dumbledore, as the ministry uses a series of smears in the Ministry-controlled press. It also unleashes one of its most ferocious attack dogs upon the school.

This attack dog, however, is in the form of a fluffy pink poodle named Dolores Umbridge (impeccably played by Imelda Staunton). Topped with a pillbox hat and dressed like a dumpy tuft of cotton candy, Umbridge is all forced smiles and rigid rule-making. Her power spreads, and she ultimately replaces Dumbledore as headmaster, sending the school back to the Dark Ages of education (the references to “creationism” being acceptable in some current classrooms cannot be overlooked here).

Meanwhile, Harry leads a rebellious lot of burgeoning witches, including longtime pals Ron Weasley (played by Rupert Grint) and Hermoine Granger (played by Emma Watson), potential Potter flame Cho Chang (played by Katie Leung) and spacey newcomer Luna Lovagood (played by Emma Lynch), to prepare for the imminent Voldemort standoff they may all face.

For the makers of “Phoenix,” there was a price to pay for the film's condensed nature: many characters are introduced with little fanfare or backstory, so it's hard to invest much interest in some of the action. But director David Yates, a veteran of British television, has signed on the for the next Potter film, “The Half-Blood Prince,” so many of the development may take place in the near future.

For now, he continues to build on the franchise's momentum. Where director Chris Columbus “birthed” the series, Alfonso Cuaron added the adult edge and mystery, and Mike Newell followed up by giving “Potter” its first feel of epic sweep.

Yates manages to give his actors (and let's face it, he's got the most impressive support ensemble from the other side of the pond – Maggie Smith, Gary Oldman, David Thewlis, Julie Walters, Emma Thompson and perhaps the series' tentpole of acting, Alan Rickman) just enough time to shine without having the film feel overcrowded.

His direction has helped to make “Phoenix” Potter's most bewitching spell yet.

Feast your eyes



With apologies to Pixar:


“In many ways, the work of a critic is easy. We risk very little, yet enjoy a position over those who offer up their work and their selves to our judgement. We thrive on negative criticism, which is fun to write and read. But the bitter truth we critics must face is that, in the grand scheme of things, the average piece of junk is more meaningful than our criticism designating it so. But there are times when a critic truly risks something, and that is the discovery and defense of the new. Last week, I experienced something new, and extraordinary film from a singularly expected source. To say that both the film and its makers have challenged my perceptions is a gross understatement. They have rocked me to my core.”


The above quote is lifted, (and slightly paraphrased) from the film “Ratatoille,” penned by the film's chief villain, food critic Anton Ego (voiced by Peter O'Toole, having a blast). And leave it to the maestros at Pixar to put it far more eloquently than this humble reviewer ever could.
Seriously, I am running out of superlatives for these guys.


Each successive film stuns and delights and makes minor improvements over the pervious. This is not to say that this is a better film than “The Incredibles,” but there are refinements made that make aspects of this film richer than before. Even Pixar's sole misstep, “Cars,” was light-years beyond any other animated film released that year.


So thoroughly are the films realized, that each elements that makes the whole is a master class – design, character development, story, even cinematography, if that is possible for an animated film.


While “Shrek” continues to hang its hat on the same tired gags and pop-culture references, and other animation studios rush to cash in on the latest market craze (fractured fairy tales, talking penguins), Pixar forges ahead in the market, constantly tweaking their product to enhance each and every aspect.


And the leader of these animated expeditions is director Brad Bird. Cutting his teeth on “The Simpsons,” and creating one of two-dimensional animation's last great achievements, “The Iron Giant,” Bird pushed Pixar to navigate uncharted waters with the studio's animation apex “The Incredibles.”


In “Ratatoille,” he's created another classic for their canon.


Pemy (voiced by comedian Patton Oswald) is a rat with a highly refined sense of culinary creations. Not satisfied with dining on the discarded refuse of his human hosts, Remy seeks out singular foods and flavors fussed over only rabid fans of “Emeril Live.”
His discriminating dining is a mystery to his brother Emile (animator Peter Sohn) and father Django (Brian Dennehy), who have no qualms with blue fuzz on their cheese and warn Remy of rodents who mix too closely with the human world.


Guided by his quest for superior sustenance, as well as a ghost of once-esteemed French chef Gusteau (voiced by Brad Garrett), Remy winds up in the City of Lights and befriends a hapless kitchen helper named Linguini (voiced by Lou Ramano).


Their inter-species camaraderie blossoms in Gusteau's formerly famous restaurant that has since suffered the perils of over-marketing thanks to its angry little sawed-off chef (voiced by Ian Holm), who pimps out the Gusteau name to everything from BBQ ribs to tacos.
Meanwhile, Linguini rises through the ranks, from garbage boy to chef, with the help of Remy quite literally pulling some strings for him. You see, Remy gets housed under his toque and manipulates his limbs by pulling tufts of Linguini's hair.


How this stumblebum of an young man can create such masterful meals astounds his boss and his co-workers (and the slapstick antics are right out of a Jerry Lewis textbook... the film is set in France, you know), including the aggressive Collette (wonderfully voiced by Janeane Garfalo).
In fact, this film is filled with many voices from noticeable actors that fly under the radar until the end credits. Where many animated films get lost in fawning over merely having a celebrity lend his or her name to a project (Justin Timberlake? Cameron Diaz? Ashton Kutcher?), Bird required his actors to get lost in their roles, treating them as though it were no different than a live-action film.


That is only part of “Ratatoille's” appeal.


Comedy, drama and action are all handled lovingly and expertly, even if the film's core message – to set aside differences and appreciate one's qualities on an indivdual basis – is time-worn.
Visually sumptuous, dramatically rich and simmering with warmth and compassion for all its characters, “Ratatoille” is yet another fine dish prepared up from an animation studio that always seems to serve its product with only the finest ingredients.

6.25.2007

A 'Shining' Lite



For all their sunny, homey décor, hotels can be rather scary places.
Urban legends of lodging abound, from hidden videocameras and guests' toothbrushes crammed in the orifices from disgruntled staff, to unwilling kidney donations and bodies found in the mattresses (the latter of which is actually true).
My wife and I even encountered our own nightmare stay at a certain hotel in Seattle, on our way home from our honeymoon, where some spirits had apparently soiled our sheets, left a case of empty beer cans outside our window and an angry apparition scrambled the television, so that we could only watch fuzzy reruns of Oprah.
But taking a tip from Stephen King, director Mikael Hafstrom unleashes hotel hell upon a cynical writer by the name of Mike Enslin (played by John Cusak) in “1408,” a new thriller with an old-school scare vibe coursing through its veins.
Based on a short story written in his “Everything's Eventual” compilation of 14 short stories, King's tale of a creepy crib in New York City pulls out all the stops in its effort to jumpstart our jaded horror expectations at the box office.
Enslin is a slept-there, debunked-that nonfiction writer who compiles lists of scary stays across the U.S.A. His books are only mildly met by the public, as the author himself does not believe, even though his writing does not necessarily pass judgement on such locales. His past (which is detailed throughout the film) has left him without faith and marginal enthusiasm for his chosen profession.
But an anonymous postcard taunting him to stay at an upscale auberge piques his interest, and he quickly sets out to the posh accommodations of New York's infamous Dolphin Hotel, in which many a guest has committed acts of atrocity in the titular room.
Simply put by the hotel's manager, Mr. Olin (played by Samuel L. Jackson), “No one's lasted over an hour in there... It's an evil f***ing room.”
You said it, brother.
Almost before Enslin can unpack his luggage, the clock radio menacingly blares “We've Only Just Begun,” by the Carpenters, and the clock's time resets itself to a countdown, starting with 60 minutes.
The rest of the film is filled with demons (both of the hotel and of Enslin's past) as the room decides to take the writer down its wicked little rabbit hole.
And since it takes predominantly in a single room with one actor, “1408” would not be worth its ectoplasm were it not for the unquestionable talents of Cusak. We believe every note of his performance, as he walks in the room a skeptic, becomes mildly anxious and heads into full-tilt terror by the final minutes of his “stay.”
The actor possesses a built-in likability through his decades on screen that has us immediately on his side, rooting for his well-being. And when he arrives at the hotel, his verbal sparring with Jackson holds the same intensity as the famous DeNiro-Pacino diner sit-down in Michael Mann's “Heat.” For the Cusak devotee, there are also a few nods to his past films scattered throughout that are subtly amusing.
And while the film's allegorical underpinnings may not satisfactorily conclude its gradual buildup, the film's style and bag of tricks sate our expectations. It relies on the out-of-nowhere crashes and thumps, but it also slowly and effectively piles on the dread, thanks in large part to the director Hafstrom, who shows much more promise here than his limp Jennifer Aniston thriller “Derailed” a few years back.
“1408” should also be credited with its ability to legitimately creep out viewers without having to goose them with gore, which seems to be the current trend.
And while it may not by the Four Seasons of horror, viewers can get more amenities from their stay at this hotel than a “Hostel” any day.

6.18.2007

'Four' on the floor



Mouth agape, I begin this column. For the world's most spiritless superheroes have once again conquered the box office, with their utterly insipid sequel, “Fantastic Four: The Rise of the Silver Surfer.”
Instead of going through the phone-book-sized list of all that is wrong with this film, I decided to dedicate this column to pitch some ideas to you, the reader. As it has proven that a film with almost any superhero is capable of making a mint, so long as it is torn from the pages of an actual comic book.
I decided to comb through the archives of D.C., Marvel and lesser-known publishers' vaults for some of the long-forgotten heroes of yore. I am now convinced with some updated plots, proper nerd-demographic marketing and sub-standard CGI, that any one of these characters could make a mint at the box office (remember, these are actual character creations from comics).
Let me know what you think, and let's greenlight these suckers! (click on the link to view pictures and learn more about these superheroes)
  1. Shaloman: A superhero, created by Al Weisner in the '80s, to give Jewish children a positive role model, Shaloman is actually made of granite and springs to life with a thundering “Oy Vey!” when he senses evil (I swear I'm not making this up).
    The new plot: A gang of rouge rabbis begin swiping sacred artifacts from temples across the country to sell on the black market and fund their ambitions of creating a nuclear weapon.
    The tagline: This summer, you have to be meshugener to miss “Shaloman!”
  2. Hummingbird: Standing a majestic six inches in height, ornithologist Alan Laurel was Hummingbird, a superhero whose sole power was to telepathically speak to certain species of birds. He once fought off criminals with a pencil.
    The new plot: A megalomaniacal scientist starts injecting birds at an aviary to create an army of winged mercenaries. But what he did not count on, was the superhero the size of a peanut to be whirring about and put an end to his evil plan.
    The tagline: This summer, see what all the buzz is about!
  3. Vita-Man: A research scientist named Will Wheeler created pills that would bring out the best in human abilities (one for strength, one for constitution, one for, ahem, speed). It's a wonder why this pill-popper did not survive into the 21st century!?
    The new plot: Victor Viagra decides to gobble all of Dr. Wheeler's panacea pills and goes on a rampage that lasts for days without sleep, including several frequent stops to the local brothels. It's up to Vita-Man to give Victor's attention a little deficit disorder.
    The tagline: Quit fiddlin' with Ritalin; stop crammin' the Ambien – There's only one pill for society's ills – Vita-Man!
  4. Nature Boy: It could be his fashionable extra-large belt, or those skin-tight skivvies of his, but Nature Boy looks way too happy to be concerned about nabbing bad guys. He was rescued at sea by Neptune and various other gods and goddesses of the ocean and land and granted the powers of the earth (like overpopulation, global warming and acid rain?).
    The new plot: When a group of cub scouts get stranded after a rafting-and-camping trip gone awry, Nature Boy swoops in to save the little lads and still has time to join them for a wiener roast.
    The tagline: This summer, Nature calls.
  5. Toy Boy: Little Jason Kriter was the son of the most wealthy man on the planet, so whatever little Jason wants, little Jason gets. So the little silver spoon-fed capitalist brat decides to amass a cadre of futuristic weapons to fight evil.
    The new plot: A group of escaped cons begin knocking over banks during the holiday season, dressed in a Santa suits they stole from a department store. Jason, not wanting the good name of the Father Christmas besmirched, hunts down each and every last one in brutal, ritualistic style. Because this film is a holiday release (ensuring a marketing blitz of Toy Boy merchandise) , he also wins the hearts of all the little boys and girls in his neighborhood, as he designs them toys which can also be used as weapons, thereby assembling a legion of crime-fighting ankle-biters.
    The tagline: This Christmas, there's only one “Toy” you need.
  6. Minute-Man: Created in 1941, Jack Weston was an ordinary schmo who wanted to do more for the war, so he became a one-man army dressed as the American Flag and taking on the enemy single-handedly.
    The new plot: In an update for the modern age, “The Minute Man” is laced with double entendres to add that comedic “edge.” And the character's alter-ego's name is changed...to George W. Bush.
    The tagline: There's only one surge necessary for “Minute Man.”
  7. The Fab Four: Yes, a direct knockoff to the Fantastic Four (and a chance to capitalize on the height of the Beatles popularity in the '60s), four “ordinary, science-loving teens” (there's an oxymoron) are zapped into their alter-egos: El, Polymer Polly, Hy and, yes Crispy, who, despite his heat-inspired name possessed the ability to freeze things.
    The new plot: During a science expo with a rival high school, the Fab Four notice that one student listed Beryllium's atomic number as 9.01219 instead of 9.01218. Chaos ensues.
    The tagline: The Fab Four: Putting the “Noble” in “Noble Gasses.”
  8. Silkie: If you thought Aquaman was the nadir of suckage as far as superpowers, take a gander at Silkie (even her name sounds like some sort of fabric softener). Tracy Winters, a former marine biologist, is amphibious and “aquakinetic” (she talks to fish). So, apparently, if any criminal decides to hideout in Atlantis, they're in for an ass-whuppin'.
    The new plot: A renegade group of whale poachers are operating a worldwide blubber ring until the cross the watery path of the soggy Silkie.
    The tagline: This summer, adventure is all wet.
  9. Skateman: A former Vietnam vet, Billy Moon is now the pride of the Roller Derby. (Yeah, I remember my childhood being spent muscled out of the “all skate” circles by those damned camo-wearing soldiers.) Aside from his groovin' moves on wheels, he also cradles a utility belt with a stash of weapons But Skateman does not go it alone. He's accompanied by his faithful skateboarding sidekick, Paco.
    The new plot: The local roller rink is closed down to pave way for a nuclear testing lab. Leave it to Skateman and Paco to unleash a torrent of four-wheeled justice on the evil scientists in the lab.
    The tagline: Skateman: He's hell on wheels!
  10. The Green Lama: A millionaire college student heads of to Tibet for postgrad work, and, after years of meditation and becoming a priest, returns with superhuman powers to fight evil. Oh, those ultra-violent Buddhists!
    The new plot: A young sociopath begins entering the minds of others during silent meditation, transforming their thought to do his evil bidding. That is, until the Lama enters the picture, espouses his karmic cantations and scares them all right into their next lives.
    The tagline: Everyone needs a hero every now and Zen.

6.11.2007

No Triskaidekaphobia here



There is much joy to be had from a trip to the ocean – be it Atlantic, Pacific or even Billy.

Two year’s ago, George Clooney, Brad Pitt and company, though, gave us the cinematic equivalent to sand in our shorts with “Ocean’s Twelve,” a sloppy, self-serving in-joke that all but ruined any considerable charm its original, “Ocean’s Eleven,” had garnered.

And while the film still went on to gross a considerable amount of money, it was hard to find someone who actually liked the film. Critically, it was a polluted “Ocean.”

But director Steven Soderbergh – one of the most flexible, risk-taking lensmen working today – was not about to sit around crying about the drubbing the film received. Instead, he and the crew reunited to issue a celluloid apology in the form of a sequel.

“Ocean’s Thirteen” could actually be titled “Ocean’s Eleven Point Five” or “Ocean’s Let’s Pretend the Last One Never Existed.” Regardless of the name, the con is on, once again back in the cold comforts of Las Vegas, and all involved could not appear happier to be home after their European vacation.

The plot is simple yet impossible to follow. I will try to elaborate. Reuben (played by Elliott Gould), who was considered a patriarchical member of the group, was swindled out of millions by Willie Bank (played by Al Pacino), a skeevy little casino owner. The devastation caused him a near-fatal attack on his ticker, and pissed off his accomplices, mainly Danny Ocean (Clooney), Rusty (Pitt), Linus (played by Matt Damon) and Basher (played by Don Chealdle). The rest of the film is devoted to the gang exacting revenge and breaking the Bank.

In order to do this, though, takes logistical precision that would require audiences to break out their protractors and slide rules – dice must be unevenly weighted, elevators must be dodged, women seduced, factories overthrown and earth must be moved (quite literally).

After weeks of bemoaning the fact that this summer’s sequels have bitten off far more than they can chew, I must admit that the overstuffed shenanigans actually help the film. Danny and his boys meet each as a challenge, not an obstacle, which adds to their hepcat cache. They make time to joke, glide, jostle and spar while the chaotic caper is being pulled off, unfazed that their odds of success are less likely than a John McCain presidential endorsement from Clooney.

The regulars all return (Bernie Mac, Casey Affleck, Scott Caan, Carl Reiner), with Pacino and Ellen Barkin rounding out this go-round’s bakers dozen. Pacino, in a role that could have easily caused him to flip his acting switch to full-tilt “screaming” mode, opts instead for the verbal valium, where his cigarette-scarred whisper becomes much more sinister. And putting the “kick” in sidekick, Barkin makes a welcome return to the public’s eye since starring in her own very public and very nasty divorce from billionaire Rob Perelman.

Throughout it Byzantine plot, “Thirteen” pauses for a solo from each of its players on its overcrowded stage. And whether its Matt Damon’s Linus attempting to enchant Barkin’s character, Affleck’s Virgil inciting a riot as an employee at a Mexican dice-making factory, or Chealdle’s Basher impersonating a Kenievel-esque daredevil, all seem to be having an infectiously good time, it’s hard not to get swept up.

It would also be a crime not to mention the once-again swingin’ score from David Holmes who fuses the frivolity with a soundtrack that would make the original Rat Pack proud.

Though the superfluously serpentine plot of “Ocean’s Thirteen” may pretend otherwise, the film’s not interested in keeping its audience riveted with the intricate twists and turns. It’s as though director Soderbergh was attempting to recreate the glitz of Vegas on screen with his stars’ wattage and camaraderie.

Whether it’s the shiny slot-machine-smile of Brad Pitt or the line delivery of Clooney’s line delivery, smooth as blackjack table velvet, ‘Thirteen” tempts you to come join in the fun and let what happens in the theater, stay in the theater.

5.28.2007

Pirates of the Caribbean: At Wit's End



Since there was so much hoopla over the fact that Rolling Stone Keith Richard (for whom Johnny Depp partly based his infamous Jack Sparrow) makes a cameo in the third voyage of “Pirates of the Caribbean,” titled “At World's End,” I thought it fitting to surmise the film by quoting from the band's decade-spanning hit list: “You can't always get what you want,but if you try sometimes, you get what you need.”

Giving the crowd just that and little more is what “At World's End” is all about. It wraps up the loose strings (at least, I think it did), but swings the door wide open for more sequels to come.

“Worl'd End” is all about high seas and low expectations. Captain Sparrow and crew are certainly all booty-licious as the main scalawags, but a beast larger than the Kraken is impeding their journey this time, and that is the script.

Suffering the same fate as a certain cinematic web-slinger and bog-dweller, this ship is far too crowded to truly set sail at full speed. Sparrow, last we saw, was getting swallowed by the fabled Kraken, and at the start of the third film, Will Turner (played by Orlando Bloom) and his ladylove Elizabeth Swann (played by Kiera Knightly) team up with Captain Barbossa (played by Geoffrey Rush) to rescue him from the depths of Davy Jones' Locker.

Meanwhile, a gathering of pirate lords is summoned to face off against Britain's East India Trading Company, who has sided with Davy Jones (played by Bill Nighy) in order to rid the seas of the sailing scoundrels.

With all that, the film's cup of grog runneth over. But writers Ted Elliott and Terry Rossio toss in additional tales of Bootstrap Bill, Calypso and a Singapore swab named Sao Feng (played by Chow Yun-Fat) until the the audience feels as though it's been made to “kiss the gunner's daughter” (go ahead, maties, look that one up, but don't consult any Disney pirate book for it's meaning, because I assure you it will not be found in there).

It's as though the filmmakers (including returning helmer Gore Verbinski and producer Jerry Buckheimer) were too busy knotting up the frayed remains of the past films that they forgot to wedge in the whimsy that made the first film such a left-field delight.

And for once, Johnny Depp, for all his flittering and fluttering, does not own the show. Sure, his triple-crossing old salt Captain Jack is essential to the trilogy's mast appeal (sorry for that one), it's been upstaged by so much noise and sabre-rattling that it becomes lost in storm of story.

The rest of the cast is as good as can be hoped for, with Bloom and Knightly feeling more comfortable in their rum-soaked surroundings and add a little more swash to their buckles as the matinee “heroes” of the pictures.

But Rush, as Captain Barbossa, and Nighy, under pounds of pixels as the squidly-diddly Davy Jones, are perched up on the crow's nest, kicking up theirs peg legs in a fit of merriment and own most of the scenes in which they are featured.

The rest of the film focuses on a plot so aggressive, that everything about “World's End” -- even the comical bits of which there are a few – seem labored and ultimately drydocked.

Technically, the “Pirates” series remains a marvel. The seamless sea-faring and monstrous Flying Dutchman crew are still wondrous in their fluidity and detail, as are the number of explosive set pieces in which splinters of debris shower the crew as cannonballs tear through decks.

Fans may be more forgiving, if only to spend a few hours (it clocks in at almost three) in an air-conditioned theater to gaze upon the bronzed visages of Depp or Bloom, or to chortle each time the film resorts to a monkey reaction shot. Or even to cheer at the brief appearance of that famous Rolling Stone when he rears his weathered head (a head which no amount of computers could airbrush into something resembling a human).

And while “Pirates” is not as bad as the two other “three-quels” that have recently stuffed the screens, it is still a weak (but perhaps brief) send-off to a grotesquely amusing cinematic hero and his crew. So far, the summer “blockbusters” may be shattering records left and right, but keep tabs on the precipitous drop during their second weeks of these films' releases. Each week of the summer movie season can be summed up by paraphrasing yet another Stones' ditty: “I said baby I'll come back, maybe next week, 'cuz I think I'm on a losing streak.”


For more movie reviews, check out Rector's website “Use Soap” at “mysite.verizon.net/beachrun113.”

5.19.2007



Ogre and done with
It took three films to do it, but the animated tale of a grumpy green giant and his fairy tale buddies has finally lost its “Shrek” appeal.
Now it's more along the lines of “What the Shrek were they thinking?
Though, to be fair, the “Shrek' franchise never had the sturdiest legs on which to stand. It had moments of brilliance, but was at times too caught up in its pop-culture relevance to withstand the aging process gracefully (let's just say that Smash Mouth and Ricky Martin both owe this cartoon a piece of their souls in turn for their DVD immortality).
With “Shrek the Third” the francjise that had once elicited so muck fun in the swamps and bogs has now become swamped and bogged down.
But don't take my word for it. During a recent kid-friendly matinee at the Movies and Midway, I counted three times in which the Dora the Explorer set broke out in honest laughter over the course of the film's 94-minute run time.
Suffering the same “Spiderman 3” story-stuffing syndrome, “Shrek the Third”is a clear-cut example of the law of diminishing returns.
Realizing that they may have apparently skewered the library of “happily ever after” offerings, the film's team of four writers decided to incorporate Arthurtian Legend as well, and the result feels like dungeon clean-up duty.
Shrek (voiced by a seemingly tired Mike Myers) and Fiona (voiced by the limited range of Cameron Diaz) are now faced with impending parenthood and royalty. Fiona is carrying around a bundle of blobbly, greed, flatulent joy, and her father, the Frog King literally croaked, leaving Shrek to rule the land of Far, Far Away.
In a desperate attempt to elude the latter responsibility, Shrek sets sail to find the only other living heir, a child who will be King Arthur, but who likes to go by the name of Artie (voiced by a disturbingly falsetto Justin Timberlake). Artie is a awkward youth who sepnds his days at a medieval high school that resembles a cross between Hogwart's Academy and Sweet Valley High.
There is also a too-little-too-late female-empowerment side story featuring a brief inclusion of Snow White, Rapunzel, Cinderella and Sleeping Beauty. But it only serves a non-sequitur, sladash afterthought, much like the random bizarre addition of frogs singing “Live and Let Die” at the Frog King's funeral.
The result is nowhere near as amusing as it may potentially read.
The only returning actor who still manages to breathe life into the proceedings is Antonio Bandaras' Puss In Boots. Puss is a feline Cassanova with a stray cat strut and shows that his kitty still has claws for comedy.
Donkey (voiced by Eddie Murphy) has been relegated to the fifth (or fifteenth) wheel, and merely blends into the scenery. He offers none of the punchy dialogue that ruled Shrek's first outing, proving he is a one-trick Donkey.
Eric Idle as Merlin the Magician is the only new voice with distinction, but even his presence is a reminder of a far funnier take on the whole Knights of the Round Table tale, “Monty Python and the Holy Grail.”
When the film slows to its requisite “lesson learning” mode, it also feels forced and out of place after attempting to stick in the gut of so many happy endings it attempts to skewer.
There is talk of three more Shreks to come down the pipeline, with a possible Puss in Boots spinoff (please, if there is a animation god, do not drag his good name through the kitty litter).
One can only hope that when the writers sit down to devise yet another addition to the “Shrek” film family, they will follow in the true footsteps of an ogre and eat its offspring.
For more movie reviews, check out Rector's website “Use Soap” at “mysite.verizon.net/beachrun113.”